It can be that not Oppenheimer is the father of atom energy and A-bomb. Rather NikolaTesla, a serbian physicist is that. Many referring documents say that in 1943 he was in poverty and did not want to wait to do this action against the Nazis. (A german officer – somehow close to Tesla’s genotype, so could be a Matrix clone at that time – and his partners did an attack against Hitler with an explosion in 1943, which not ended with success). So Tesla could sale this invention to the US, secretly behind the scenes, (and sins).
He also experimented with lightning energy from the Nature to deserve for other consumes. This electric experiment can be great with using weatherforecast or more intervention.
Perpetuum Mobile or “Ever mover” can be made easily if we accept that the “ever” is just cca one or two thousand years. So a simple river driven water mill made of matters those can keep up for a long time can represent such structure.
I share here great simple solution to demonstrate how works an almost perpetuum mobile as an electric machine. Its most important parts are the permanent springs. These ones responsable for the permanency plus the electric-mechanic feedback. I hope that my drawing is understandable:
But we can power these great structures more with clock’s mechanics in bigger size that compairs to the energies of the given system. This structure or system can move easilly and economically like a mechanical watch can do. This also means as far as I know, a solution of those little-big problems of Physics. Probably Einstein’s quote “I should have become a watchmaker” was referred to this. But it can be imagined that Chaplin’s Modern times film also referred to this. However it is very serious theme.
With this solution can make movement of the bicycle and other vehicle easier and economical, not only water mill, of course. It is easily presumable that the mechanical computers were made from this solution. And very similary to this, the almost the latest announcement of Volvo about its new flywheel motor. (60000 rpm, 25% boost to mpg, etc.)
Driving Volvo’s KERS Flywheel Hybrid Prototype: What It’s Like
Hopefully many inventions will use “timeless” these great solutions!
On the Youtube.com the people have been uploading many of interesting things in question:
Edward Teller and some other scientists solved the fusion – or thermonuclear or hydrogen – bomb’s problem in 1952. It was probably applied a normal atomic – fission – bomb first to heat up the hydrogen fuel properly.
However, Edward Teller said many times in the media that the fusion energy would not be apply simply to the an energy plant, because of its large explosion. But I think it can be used in small packages of fuels to avoid this problem.
As far as I knew, the fission energy could have been applicable as an usage of underwater nuclear bomb’s underneath detonation. This also means that recent regularly deployed set of warheads can be used as application of normal, peaceful atomic energy for heating water to turbines and producing electricity by their generators (connected to turbines). However, this manner of producing is toxic and for this it has to be avoided. But in the case of the fusion energy and H-Bomb, this problem is not so significant. So these bombs and their small packages probably can be used this way for peaceful, not so toxic energy production, and their source, the hydrogen atoms can be available in large amounts from the water.
I think I am not alone with this view and hope this energy will be achievable in soon as possible for the all of Humankind!
China’s Tianhe-2 Caps Top 10 Supercomputers
“The Tianhe-2, a massive system that clocked 33.86 petaflops, or 33.86 thousand trillion floating point operations per second
Titan which is housed at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory executed 17.59 petaflops—a little over half of the Tianhe-2’s supercomputing muscle.
Built at China’s National University of Defense Technology, Tianhe-2 (also known as the Milky Way-2) consists 3.12 million computing cores. The machine is scheduled to be fully operational by the end of this year.”
I was glad to read this. Congratulations! Probably we can hope in some good news furthermore if China can do the things well.
The one thing – can be heard from the air, as you know, on June 26, 2013 – is that the power supply by bigger torque can be more efficient in vehicles than it widely applied.
However it is widely admitted that buses or trucks have not so many horsepowers in their engines than in the other simple cars’ ones, but they can really carry more burdens.
The trick is the applying the Physics knowledge better creating bigger gear shift with implemantating bigger pinions which make bigger force with bigger torque. As it solved in an average bicycle. It’s simple, isn’t it?
Furthermore, if it uses less power so it is more efficient then it needs less gasolin and makes less dust. So it is cheaper and cleaner to use than most best vehicles! Great to know it. But most of people do not mind with this theory and it must be proven by proper practical measurements and tests, however it can be more exciting and important than a race on TV!
Not only at desingings of Jet fighters and Rockets are important to observe the fundamental laws of Physics and Aerodynamics (and Hydrodynamics). But at submarines’, buses’, trucks’, trains’, trams’, airplanes’ designings. However, it is not really seems nowadays, the EU wants to change now at trucks’ as you can read in my BLOG:
Nevertheless, some passenger planes have been modifed finally as probably you know from the news.
This basic selection is based on the Kinetic energy theory and its Mathematical backgrounds. In classical mechanics, the kinetic energy of a non-rotating object of mass m traveling at a speed v is ½ mv². (Source: Wikipedia). And if we want to approximate the energy at a high speed than mass m will not count, however the speed will be basicly quadratic. And the graphical solution of the quadratic term is a hyperbola. The hyperbola is one of the four kinds of conic section, formed by the intersection of a plane and a cone. So, at the highest speed result is a triangle. And this shape is used by, for example, sharks in nature to fight against to water resistance, too.
However, sharks’ shape should not be used as a template for airplanes and Jetfighters often, because it is a fish, and water has other physical parameteres than air. This problem can be more noticeable, for example at the USA made Lockheed F-104 Starfighter jet where designers added smaller surface wings. So the jet eventually earned a reputation as a “Widowmaker”.
Here it is read: http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=113
As this turned out only the Germans could use this jet type, and after neither them did it. (“It is a gift with love from the USA.” as generally used to say in James Bond style of its Thatcher era.)
As I can suppose, not just this type of airplanes has this problem.
It can be also big issue the planes’ weakness. As shown bellow, a picture of a news, just a bird can cause a big hurt in these vehicles. Regardless that bird wanted to be a pilot killer or not, I think it is quite dangerous to fly with these machines, not saying about their falling.
Seeing the picture, several ducks could fly over this aircraft?!
Back to the mathematical solution, the triangle shape can be applied at designings of tyres as well as to their profiles and their grips. I have made a simple figure to demostrate the proper profiles as I imagined. It is sure, for the sake of best solution, it is needed to take more counts, simulations and tests. So, the figure can be seemed bellow:
Notwithstanding the provisions of some top races, the slowings must be realized by the brakes mostly, not by tyres. So brake discs sould be created such like clutch discs to be more roughened. It is more efficient when the two roughened surfaces involve in the friction, not the only one of them. However, it has been also ignored yet, by competents.
By the way, the profile of the above mentioned tyres can influence other important industrial sectors, such as building construction, and bus, plane, and train chasies designings. Some carmakers according to the recent news now
And weak tyres can be better at high speeds as at racing bicycle’s. Although it has been also forgotten by top competents, yet. ∞
The Trabant is an old, former East German car brand from Zwickau, Saxony.
According to the Wikipedia:
“In 2008, Time magazine rated the Trabant as one of the 50 worst cars ever made.”
“and it is said that it might symbolize of the sickness of the former East Germany’s system.”
However, the Trabant 601 still has advantages to our recently most advanced cars, namely it had use
two-stroke engine. I think that “the specialists” confuse advantages of four-stroke engine with flywheel engine’s and therefore they do not see the two-stroke engine’s as better. And Trabant had bearings and needle bearings for piston pins, according to this site:
The needle bearings can reduce the friction much better than the oil only. Nevertheless, they rearly provided to engines this good piece part.
The Wikipedia also mentioned that
“In the West, much has been written about the Trabant, mostly negative: to comedic effect, emphasis was placed on the shortcomings of the Trabantt”
however the problem of the Communism still is in our world, after its fall. The HONDA S600 had needle bearings, in 1964. However, it is forgotten somehow. Although, with these technologies HONDA won the first F1 race as it was written in the following quotation:
“Made of aluminum, it features roller-chain-driven dual overhead cams, hemispherical cross-flow heads, four Keihin side-draft carbs, and a built-up crankshaft that uses seven caged, needle-roller bearings for the mains and connecting-rod big-ends. This setup enables a 9500-rpm redline and can safely spin to above 11,000 revs! (If this sounds like Formula 1 technology, remember that Honda entered F1 racing in 1963, developing a unique 1.5-liter V-12 engine and chassis that won its first race in 1965.)
According to recent news, so Honda was asked to produce motor to Mclaren after Mercedes motor usage driving its racing cars.
It is strange a little bit.
This means the recent West system’s sickness to the former East Germany’s! The causes of these failures and sins can be searched among the Matrix and its leaderships.
Many car makers deliver their engine with turbo for supercharging nowadays. However, the compressor usage does not need to use the engine’s exhaust gas which is choking the engine’s power and makes less efficient combustion, so it is much toxic and expensive. Although compressors need other driving source, for example electric such as independent electric motor driving or mechanic such as belt or chain driving, but these drivings need less energy as I think because electric motors are more efficient than internal combustion engines.
This problem is almost same old as the carmaking itself, (and its other problems). So it is the time to change this after all(or rather these).
It is a good news that the Mercedes makes – not only – its “flagship”, Mercedes Benz CL 63 AMG, with compressor.
One man compared previously the automotive industry to information technology from the aspect of speed of development. His results could cause frustration to those who were satisfied with their vehicles. However as I used to mention that the problems have been almost the same, unfortunatelly, since decades or more.
Here you can see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo webpage, but I do not like its expressions – not only in this car tool theme – which can cause ambiguities to the people as far as I know. For example the webpage mention water injection to reducing temperature, but as I know it is primarily for growing mass of the combustion.
This is a good news for car makers and all the people.
The whole article can be read at this webpage: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-328_en.htm